Quantcast
Channel: Cop Block » georgia state patrol

Once Lauded as Top DUI Enforcer, Thomas Kustra Proves Perverse Incentives

$
0
0

renegade law enforcement officers who act like Trooper Kustra is an equally serious crime and should be treated as such. He has violated my friends constitutional rights, shown total and complete disregard for the law and caused much harm and damage to her personal, professional and financial life.
-complainant

Thomas Kustra, employed at the Georgia State Patrol, made it his mission to target DUI drivers. He averages three DUI arrests per shift, for a whopping 282 total in 2010, earning him Georgia Officer DUI Hero Award and the Officer of the Year from Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD).

Kustra is part of the Nighthawks DUI Task Force which boasts the “most highly trained DIU enforcement officers in Georgia.” Despite whatever good intentions Kustra and his colleagues have, at the end of the day, like all in law enforcement, they’re responding to incentives. Perverse incentives.

His incentive is not to “serve and protect” but to make arrests. That metric – arrests – is one of the only objective ways he can gauge his impact. Quite literally he’s incentivized to make arrests. Even when there’s no one harming a person or property.

Do you think Kustra was disappointed that he received recognition from MADD? Or that last December, Jack Hill and Johnny Grant, “senators” in Georgia, sponsored a resolution “Recognizing and commending Trooper First Class Thomas Kustra; and for other purposes” that adorned him with such praise:

it is abundantly fitting and proper that the extraordinary accomplishments of this distinguished Georgian be appropriately recognized. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE that the members of this body commend the courageous and selfless dedication of Trooper First Class Thomas Kustra and recognize him on receiving the Meritorious Service Award from the Peace Officers’ Association of Georgia.

Kustra and his colleagues don’t have to please their “customers.” They operate without competition. Like every other government program their incentive is only to expand – to grow in size and scope.

In fact, since it’s founding in 2004, Nighthawk has tripled in personnel (from 1o to 30) and doubled the ground they cover (from five to 10: Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton and Gwinnett to Athens-Clarke, Bulloch, Chatham, Clayton, Cobb, Columbus, DeKalb, Fulton, Gwinnett and Macon).

And why shouldn’t they? What budgetary restrictions do they face? Not many, considering that they have a ready-made “customer” base – everyone who lives within the arbitrary political boundaries of Georgia who is told “your money or your life“, which funds the ramped-up police state in which Kustra prides himself at being at the forefront.

Incentives do make a difference. Do you think Everyone Kustra ever arrested was actually unable to safely operate a vehicle?

Below is a complaint filed with Georgia’s Department of Public Safety Special Investigations Unit (SIU) about Kustra’s actions that is very telling. The complainant was hesitant to make-public their name at this time since they received a call threatening arrest if it was made.

Today I called SIU (404-624-7523) and spoke with Angie Holt, it’s head. I noted that I was recording the call and expressed my experience – that folks with badges often get-away with things wrong for you or I – and encouraged them to do the right thing. Holt noted that she’d pass-along word to the person investigating the complaint. And she did confirm that Kustra was currently still on the job. We’ll see what happens…

Have you had a run-in with Kustra, pro or con? Leave a comment and let his reputation speak for itself.

.

.

June 7, 2012

From: XXXXX XXXXXXXX

To: XXXXXX XXXXXX, Special Investigation Division, Georgia State Patrol

CC: John Lewis, State Representative, Governor Nathan Deal

RE: Complaint Against Trooper Kustra

PLEASE NOTE: I received a call from somebody who I believe Identified himself as “Corporal Custer” from the Ga State Patrol, cell number (XXX) XXX-XXXX on June 7, 2012 at 2:08pm. He threatened to arrest me if I file this complaint. In addition he said the complaint was past the statue of limitations, and would not be heard. I asked him if he was part of SID. He said he was not, and they would not take my complaint. When asked who I should talk to in order to file this complaint, he refused to answer the question, but instead replied that the complaint would not be heard. At this point and time, due to the threatening nature of the call, and the extremely aggressive response and demeanor of the person I spoke with, I am in fear for my own safety, and fear retaliation for filing this report. If, indeed, I need to be arrested for filing this complaint, then do so – I am willing to go to jail if I have to in order to do what I believe to be the right thing, but I hereby formally request that any further harassment from any government employee, including, but not limited to the Georgia State Patrol, stop immediately.

I’d like to file a complaint against Trooper Kustra. He is guilty of the following offences:

1) Careless & Reckless Driving
2) Needlessly Endangering the Life of a Passenger in His Patrol Car
3) Compromising a Criminal Case
4) Departing from the Truth
5) False and Wrongful Arrest
6) Knowingly Making a False Report
7) Giving False Testimony in Fulton County Court
8) Misuse of State Resources

On March 18, 2010, 11:56pm My friend was pulled over by Georgia St Patrol Trooper Kustra in Buckhead. I was in the passenger seat. She was coming from dinner at an upscale restaurant. She had 1 glass of wine with her dinner, which lasted over an hour and a half. He arrested her, 2 hours after consuming that glass of wine. According to the charges filed by Trooper Kustra, she had failed to maintain her lane, which gave him probable cause to stop the vehicle.

She was handcuffed, placed inside the police car and arrested for DUI. Her car was less than 500 ft from her driveway. Trooper Kustra would not allow me to drive the 500 feet, nor did he administer the standard field sobriety tests; The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test, The One Leg Stand test or The Walk and Turn Test. He insisted the car be towed and impounded. According to the woman being arrested, Trooper Kustra read some information to her from a small card concerning her rights once in the patrol car. He read it so quickly she was unable to understand. When she asked the trooper to repeat the information more slowly and clearly, he refused.

At this point, I walked the 500 ft, carrying her belongings from the car, back to her house. I waited about 30 minutes to make sure the 2 glasses of wine I had consumed with dinner, at this point, almost 5 hours earlier, would in no way impair my ability to drive. I then got in my car to go bail her out of jail. As I turned down Piedmont Avenue, Trooper Kustra flew past me with her in the back. They were traveling at a ridiculous rate of speed. His blue lights were not on. I caught up with them a few stop lights down the road. As we turned to get on I 85 headed south, he began to speed up. Thinking it would save me from having to use my GPS to find the jail, I decided to follow them. By the time we reached the 17th street exit, we were going 85 miles an hour in a 55mph zone. I backed off my speed as I was concerned about my own safety at this point. By the 10th Street exit, Trooper Kustra was going what appeared to be triple digit speeds. I was doing 75 mph and had lost complete sight of him before we reached the North Ave. exit. His blue lights were still not on. The accused was not put in a seat belt, and later claimed she had been slammed around the back of the patrol car, handcuffed, to the point of having bruises on her wrists, hands and shoulders. I fail to see any emergency situation that warranted that degree reckless driving and endangerment of his passenger who was handcuffed, not secured and unable to protect herself.

On Monday, June 4th, 2012, I went to testify on her behalf at a jury trial, which ended her two year nightmare. The trial lasted all day. After less than 4 minutes of deliberation, the jury came back with a not guilty verdict on both counts; failure to maintain lane and DUI. Trooper Kustra, who has since been promoted, testified she had swerved into oncoming traffic, across the double yellow lines. Myself and the defendant (we were both in the car at the time) both testified this was not true (which it was not, nor was there any traffic on the road). Somehow, the video footage of the arrest, which was crystal clear, did not contain the footage of the infraction, due to “technical problems with the camera”. In addition, Trooper Kustra testified that she had glassy eyes, smelled of alcohol, and slurred speech. Her voice can be clearly heard on the video and it is not slurred in the least little bit, nor did she smell of alcohol or have glassy eyes. The reality is she was pulled over without probable cause and wrongfully arrested by a trooper who acted as though he was above the law. Her defense attorney pointed out she had been given the field sobriety tests while wearing 2 ½” heels on rough, broken pavement.

Now that the trial is over, and she won (if you can call it that), the aftermath is around $10,000 in legal fees, bail, court reporter, impound fee’s, etc. In addition, the defendant had gotten a six figure job, but was dismissed after the last step, the background check, which revealed the pending case (she had never been arrested before and had no prior legal issues). In addition, she was detained and interrogated by customs upon entering the country twice (her job at the time involved international travel – the arrest may or may not have contributed to her being laid off). When her previous employer laid her off as a result of the economy, she was left with no option but to empty her retirement savings to pay for her defense. She is currently in negotiations with her bank to try to keep her condo in Buckhead, which may or may not happen. The two years of terrible anxiety has taken a toll on her health. She has bills from a physiologist that need to be paid. All of this as a direct result of Troopers Kustra’s poor judgment and total disregard for the law.

We have many supporting documents, including the receipt from the restaurant showing her one glass of wine and the time the bill was paid shortly before her arrest. In addition, we have the possibility of tracking down the waiter to testify as such. We also have the video of the arrest, along with all of the court documents, receipts, etc. We are currently waiting for the court transcriptions.

I would also like to add that Kustra forced the case to go to trial despite the State having zero chance of winning the case, and, according to our defense attorney, the prosecuting attorney’s desire to not try the case. I can only imagine the cost of a courtroom for 10 hours, his 7 hours, his patrol car parked for 7 – 8 hours, two attorneys from the DA’s office, 11 hours of the judges time, the jurors time, the court officer for 12 hours and the two corrections officers that spent an hour outside of the courtroom. The cost of the wasted resources to the State and Fulton County must be substantial. All over 1 glass of wine with a dinner.

In closing, I’d like to say, firstly, that I do not condone driving impaired, think it is a very serious crime, and a threat to public safety. I’ve never been arrested for it, and I don’t do it. That being said, renegade law enforcement officers who act like Trooper Kustra is an equally serious crime and should be treated as such. He has violated my friends constitional rights, shown total and complete disregard for the law and caused much harm and damage to her personal, professional and financial life. The police are supposed to be the good guys, and when they stop being the good guys, the system is broken. According to documents released by MADD, In 2010, Trooper Kustra, was credited for 282 DUI arrests, the most DUI arrests in the State of Georgia for that year. While his hard work and determination are admirable, I have to wonder, of that record breaking achievement, how many of those arrests were lawful and how many of those accused are simply victims like my friend, of Kustra’s race up the rankings of the Georgia State Patrol.

I hereby swear that to the best of my knowledge, the above is true.

XXXXX XXXXXXX

Once Lauded as Top DUI Enforcer, Thomas Kustra Proves Perverse Incentives is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights


Gwinnett County Employees Use of Forced Blood Draws

$
0
0

Gwinnett Co. Sheriff employees – those on the Rapid Response Team – as well as nurses contracted, have been involved in the taking blood from individuals without their consent. To be clear, individuals who have not harmed anybody or any property have been kidnapped, strapped to a table, and against their will, having their blood taken by some employed at the Gwinnett County Sheriff’s Department.

If you or I did that what would it be called?

gwinnett-county-sheriff-department-rapid-response-team-copblock

Those on Gwinnett Sheriff’s Deptartment’s Rapid Response Team have restrained individuals who’ve harmed no one else, against their will, while a nurse takes their blood.

GWINNETT COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
770.619.6500
2900 University Pkwy. NE
Lawrenceville, GA 30043
http://gwinnettcountysheriff.com

At least two Gwinnett Co. Sheriff employees have tried to deflect the culpability of their actions or the actions done by their colleagues, by focusing on the fact that the blood draws done rely on search warrants obtained by those at the Gwinnett police outfit.

No matter the costume or badge worn, those who initiate force are in the wrong.

GWINNETT POLICE DEPARTMENT
770.513.5000
75 Langley Drive
Lawrenceville, GA 30046
http://gwinnettcounty.com/portal/gwinnett/Departments/Police

FOIA STATUS

  • on Wed., Nov. 13, 2013 a FOIA request was submitted by Pete Eyre in writing when at the facility used by the Gwinnett Sheriff outfit.
  • on Thur., Nov. 14, 2013 Eyre received a call from Shannon Volkodav, an employee of the Gwinnett Sheriff outfit, to clarify the information sought
  • on Thur., Nov. 14, 2013 Liz Hallsworth [770-619-6671, elizabeth.hallsworth@gwinnettcounty.com], an employee of the Gwinnett Sheriff outfit, sent Eyre two emails, each of which included a .pdf attachment, which are now uploaded to http://scribd.com/copblock and embedded below for transparency
  • on Thur., Nov. 14, 2013 Eyre called the Gwinnett police outfit, per the recommendations of Volkodav and Hallsworth, to learn the names of those individuals who did not give consent for a DUI test who later had their blood forcible taken, per a search warrant obtained by Gwinnett police employees. Eyre was eventually directed to Penny [770.513.5250], who facilitates FOIA requests
shannon-volkodav-email-foia-gwinnett-sheriff-1-copblock liz-hallsworth-email-foia-gwinnett-sheriff-3-copblock liz-hallsworth-email-foia-gwinnett-sheriff-1-copblock liz-hallsworth-email-foia-gwinnett-sheriff-2-copblock

 

2013 11 14 a Gwinnett County Sheriff FOIA by CopBlock
A 21-pg document sent by Liz Hallsworth (770.619.6671), an employee of the Gwinnett Co. (GA) Sheriff’s outfit to Pete Eyre.

  • Page #1 is a cover sheet
  • Page #2- RRT 2013.07.20, Pages #3-5 show the Rapid Response Team roster by rank at specific dates [Page #3 2013.04.26; #4 2012.08.17, #5 2012.04.20.
  • Pages #6-12 the “Pre-Admissions” policy signed by D Pinkard, employed at the Gwinnett Sheriff outfit.The text details how people being brought to the facility to be caged should be treated.

Note that section “J.1″ allows for pat downs to be done by a person of a different gender, so long as a colleague – who too is a different gender than the one being patted-down – is present.

The person being caged – as outlined in section “K” – is then subjected to a body image scanner. In fact, it’s proscribed that that person has to have two images taken – first with feet on yellow footprints, then on blue footprints.

The password and login for the body scanner is given as “General” and “L3-scan1″

Section “Q”, with the heading “Blood Draw Search Warrants”, begins with “GCSO [Georgia County Sheriff’s Office] personnel will assist with the service of a search warrant for arrestees who have refused a voluntary blood draw.”

Note that:
– someone and taking their blood is sugar-coated as “service of a search warrant”.
– this section condones the initiation of force. Its claims that it’s just for a Person A to violate Person B’s rights, simply because Person A wears a badge

 

2013 11 14 b Gwinnett County Sheriff FOIA
A 5-pg document sent by Liz Hallsworth (770.619.6671), an employee of the Gwinnette Co. (GA) Sheriff’s outfit to Pete Eyre. It was the second of two documents Hallsworth sent to Eyre on 2013.11.14 related to a  FOIA request Eyre had submitted when at the facility that houses the Gwinnette Co. Sheriff’s outfit.

  • Page #1 is a cover sheet.
  • Pages #2-5 discloses Police Number 8.U on Security and Control used by Gwinnett Co. Sheriff employees, specifically related to the use of a restraint bed.

The definition given for a “Restraint bed” – indicated as section “IV” – is to limit the behavior of those “at risk of harming themselves, others or causing property damage” yet the stated policy – which employees of the Gwinnett Co. Sheriff’s outfit each chose to act upon – is to restrain every person who denies consent, including those compliant, behavior that doesn’t then fit within the defined use of the restraint bed.

However – and this is what happens when the same person or group of people is allowed to write “law” and then interpret “law” – in section “B”, the “Conditions for Use”, another justified use is claimed: “To minimize the possibility of a situation escalating.”

Again, the blood draws are being done against the stated refusal of the individual. It’s not surprising that someone strapped to a table against their will might become agitated. This policy claims that sheriff employees can proactively initiate more force to curtail such pushback. Pretty draconian…

The policy continues under section “C” to say, “A minimum of five deputies shall be all be altered”, which sounds good in theory as it means more eyes, which one would hope would deter unacceptable behavior, though the rest of the sentence reveals the nefarious reason, “to control and secure the inmate’s arms and legs” with another maintaining “control of the inmates head.”

Later, under section “D”, it’s noted that should an inmate refuse to comply, “deputies will use the amount of physical force reasonably necessary to establish and maintain control.” Keep in mind that the so-called “inmate” has done nothing to harm another person or anyone else’s property.

What right does anyone have to hold another down against their will? And to take from them their bodily fluids?

 

2013 11 18 Gwinnett Co. RRT personnel

Page #1 is a cover sheet.

Page #2-3 gives the name and departmental email and phone for Gwinnett Co. Sheriff’s employees on the Rapid Response Team (who were involved in the restraining of people suspected of DUIs, against their will, for a forced blood draw-

Apparently individuals who work in Gwinnett County aren’t alone in their policy of initiating force for those who refuse to give consent. The program began in 2006 in Douglas County, which is just west of Atlanta and has been used by the Nighthawks – a unit of the Georgia State Patrol that focuses on DUIs, as well as employees of Cherokee County, which is just north of Atlanta. When Gwinnett County employees started their policy of “No Refusals” in January of 2013, the thing that set them apart was their default to restrain every person who did not give consent.

CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE
678.493.4100
498 Chattin Drive
Canton, GA 30115
http://cherokeega-sheriff.org

DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE
770.942.2121
8470 Earl D. Lee Blvd.
Douglasville, GA 30134
http://sheriff.douglas.ga.us

GEORGIA STATE PATROL – NIGHTHAWKS
404.624.7082
959 E. Confederate Ave. SE
Atlanta, GA 30316
http://dps.georgia.gov/nighthawks-dui-task-force-

The initiation of force against a person is never justified. That statement remains factual whether the action is done by you, your neighbor, or someone who happens to don a badge.

RELATED RESOURCES

POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY TOUR

police-accountability-tour-rectangular

Gwinnett County Employees Use of Forced Blood Draws is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

DUI Checkpoint – Trooper Attempts to Open Door

$
0
0

Ashton Woolen shared this post via CopBlock.org’s submit page.

February 20, 2014

Post 28 – Jasper Counties: Cherokee, Pickens
Ph: 706-692-4835
Troop Commander: Capt. E. Joe Hamby
130 State Route 20
Spur Cartersville, GA 30120
Ph: 770-387-4053 and 4003

February 20, 2014 in Woodstock, Georgia: At approximately 10:00 PM, an old work friend messaged me explaining that she knew a DUI checkpoint was nearby. I looked up the location, grabbed my two GoPro Hero 3s, and headed to seek out the checkpoint. The speed limit was 35 on the approaching road so I was going slowly, but as I finished going up a hill, I found myself at a 4-way stop. This 4-way stop was also the checkpoint. There were no signs and no place to turn around. I cracked my window about four inches as I rolled to a stop.

Trooper#1 asked how I was doing to which I responded, “I’m doing good, how ’bout yourself?” He then proceeded to tap my window and told me to roll my window down. I told him I was comfortable where it was. He then pushed it down another couple inches. At that point, only eight seconds after being stopped, Trooper#2 attempted to open my door, very hard. Trooper#2 then told me to, “Get out of the car, dude.” I ignored his demand as Trooper#1 asked for my license which I handed him. Trooper#1 then walked away and said, “You’ll get this (my license) back when you roll your window down. Then, Trooper#2 tried to say that they can’t hear well, even though my GoPro in a waterproof case can pick up their voices perfectly fine when they are in front of my car.

They then notice I have a dash cam and proceed to detain me for having “almost illegal tires.” I pulled into secondary where they told me to test all my lights for a ‘vehicle inspection.’ I denied doing it once, then complied, for I did not know the legalities of vehicle inspections. After realizing there was nothing wrong with my car for them to cite me with anything, they attempted to get me out of the car again, but this time to check my tire ‘for my own safety.’ I declined and they began asking me loaded questions and trying to get me upset by saying that I am afraid of the dark. Then they left me to sit for 8 minutes before Trooper#1 came back to return my license.

He stuck it in my window but would not let go when I tried to grab it. He then threatened me that if he ever sees my car on the road again, he’s going to pull me over. He then brought up a speeding ticket from three years ago and said that was the reason I was scared to get out.

Because of my previous occurrence with GSP, Georgia State Patrol, I thought I was not going to have any problems and that they would be professional. Boy was I wrong. Needless to say, I am very disappointed in the illegal and immature actions of these troopers.

GSP Mission Statement:

The mission of the Georgia Department of Public Safety is to work cooperatively with all levels of government to provide a safe environment for residents and visitors to our state. Although focused primarily on the enforcement of traffic laws and investigation of traffic crashes, the Department of Public Safety will support the efforts of all public safety agencies to reduce crime, apprehend those who commit them, and respond to natural and man-made disasters. In all of our endeavors, DPS personnel will remain committed to following our core beliefs of trust, fortitude, compassion and professionalism.

Trust

Trust is our hallmark and foundation. Our word is our bond. Truthfulness is what the public expects from us and what we demand of ourselves. We are committed to the highest ethical standards and highest level of performance beyond reproach.

Fortitude

We are committed to persevere through sacrifice and adversity to do the right thing, even at personal cost. In the tradition of those who preceded us, we are confident in our ability to fairly enforce all laws, to protect life and property, and to be accountable for our actions.

Compassion

We have the courage and wisdom to be fair. We are sensitive to the needs of others and are committed to treat all with dignity and respect.

Professionalism

As an elite and diverse team of highly trained, motivated men and women, we are committed to providing effective, efficient, and courteous service. We pledge to set innovative standards for others to follow.

DUI Checkpoint – Trooper Attempts to Open Door is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

“Let’s play on BIG BOY terms. Let’s not play the lawyer game and my rights are violated game or none of that BULLCRAP today.”

$
0
0

Incident date : January 9th, 2015

Employees : Trooper Johnston and an unknown supervisor

Department : Georgia State Patrol

Contact : Major Tommy Waldrop
959 E. Confederate Ave., SE
Atlanta, GA 30316
(404) 624-7451

_____________________________

Dilshodjon Tulyaganov has been accused of not “coming  to  a complete stop”. According to Georgia state law it is required that you provide ID if a state employed law enforcement agent has “probable cause” or “reasonable suspicion”  that you have committed a crime. Here the supposed crime is a failure to come to a complete stop.  Dilshodjon provides the state required information but retains his right to be silent. Dilshodjon is not only calm in his demeanor, but also understands what is and is not required from him by law from the State during this type of law enforcement contact.

Trooper Johnston asks if the “address is current” at which point Dilshodjon exhorts his right and refuses to answer any other questions. Trooper Johnston then says “you don’t have a choice but to answer”,  yet presses the issue no further and shifts the topic over to the supposed traffic violation/infraction (the crime) and returns to his vehicle to write up the citation.

At approx 5.22 of the video the trooper returns back to Dilshodjon and asks him to get out of the car. Rightfully, Dilshodjon does not comply. Trooper Johnston let’s his ego and pride start to run the interaction as he claims again “you don’t have a choice” and opens the car door. Trooper Johnson then proceeds to tell Dilshodjon to “step on out before I pull you out” followed up by “all you have to do is do what I am ASKING you to do”.  Again, Dilshodjon calmly, politely, and well within his rights does not comply and asks for a supervisor. When Dilshodjon asks for the trooper to shut his door, the trooper refuses and begins to get agitated as Dilshodjon points out that the citation can be explained through the open window with the door closed. Trooper Johnston then says “I don’t think you understand, this is MY traffic stop”, and again, “all you had to DO is DO what I ASK”. So, is that really asking? Once more Dilshodjon asks the trooper to shut his door at which point trooper Johnston says “I’m not closing the door, you need to step out” and reaches into the car  grabbing at Dilshodjon. The trooper must have had a moment of clarity as he backs off a little and resists his urge to continue his assault on Dilshodjon. Soon after though Dilshodjon reaches out to shut the door and Johnston stops him,  physically assaults him, forcefully removes him from the car and places him in handcuffs. He tells Dilshodjon that he is not able to perform his “duty”.  Trooper Johnston apparently has no idea what his actual duty is if he is claiming that Dilshodjon, by not complying to an unlawful and unconstitutional order, is obstructing.

Film The Police Banner copblock-radio-show-sidebar-300x-80banner

 

Dilshodjon was assaulted,  illegally detained, and illegally searched.

When the supervisor shows up he explains Georgia state law concerning providing ID. It becomes apparent     that the supervisor wasn’t really informed by trooper Johnston as to what the issue was as he demonstrates he was unaware that the ID had already been presented to Johnston. When he is told ID has already been given over, the supervisor says, “that’s all he (johnston) was looking for”. This verifies that Dilshodjon was in compliance with the State law requiring ID. When Dilshodjon tells the supervisor it’s about answering other questions the supervisor has to begin to deceitfully convince Dilshodjon that what has been done  to him is perfectly legal.

The supervisor says ” ok here, here’s, let me try to see where he’s coming from with this and it’s PROBABLY the way I would be coming at it”. So the supervisor really doesn’t want to know where the trooper is “coming from”. He follows up with his reasoning and justification for their coercion in forcing the answer to followup questions.  Notice the supervisor states in his justification “the only thing I’m doing is ASKING”. There sure is a lot of forceful asking going on. All of a sudden the age ol “if you have nothing to hide” deceit tactic is pulled out. It get’s even better as the supervisor says “i mean, let’s throw all the legal mumbo jumbo out the window sir, ok. Let’s play on BIG BOY terms. Let’s not play the lawyer game and my rights are violated game or none of that BULLCRAP today.” After that sad view of your rights was used as a tactic of sidetracking, the supervisor sneaks the question in again. When he finds out it’s not the same address he ASKS “will you provide that address to this officer?” Once Dilshodjon answered, the supervisor continues to further the “investigation” with other follow up questions. Remember that in the beginning of this whole contact that Dilshodjon did not consent and invoked his 5th amendment right plainly and clearly. Now through scare tactics, deceit, and coercion Dilshodjon begins to answer their questions.

Hang on, it’s not over yet. We have yet to get to the “legalities” that this supervisor wants to discuss. The legality he starts with is a scenario of “what ifs”, neglecting that all the information that Dilshodjon would actually need concerning his court date is on the citation itself. More importantly he neglected providing any “legalities” at all in his excuses in covering the illegal behavior they were performing under color of law. He goes on to say that he is ” the top of the line supervisor”. There is no one above him. He proceeds to give more “legalities” when he gives “advice” and suggests that “it would probably be in your best interest to sign the citation”. He explains that if Dilshodjon doesn’t sign the citation that they would “feel like” he was “a flight risk” and he would be taken to jail.  Is that the legal knowledge of the  “top of the line supervisor”? Does he understand his own “legal mumbo jumbo”?

Trooper Johnston then returns back with the citation and spews what I call the “self righteous” cop attitude by saying “you realize we could have avoided all of this if you had told me that 20 minutes ago, do you realize that?”. I’m curious to know if trooper Johnston realized it could have all been over with if he had not persisted on violating Dilshodjon rights. This poor logic in self righteousness is a very scary attribute that many officers carry.

Trooper Johnson then ends the contact with “did you learn something today?” “Let’s not do it again, ok?”

~ Danny

 

Georgia CopBlock ~ Website ~ Facebook

___________________________________________________________________________________

The Doggie Treat Deceit Episode 1 & 2


“Let’s play on BIG BOY terms. Let’s not play the lawyer game and my rights are violated game or none of that BULLCRAP today.” is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights

Police Departments Around Country Launch Summer Ticketing Blitzkriegs

$
0
0

Operation Border to Border, Operation Seeing RedOperation Thunder – These are the names of just a few of the mass ticketing blitzkriegs being unveiled by police departments across the country just in time for summer.

Predictably, as the fiscal year nears its end in September, wasteful and corrupt local governments seek to pad their balance sheets in preparation of the fulfillment of the years final financial obligations.

The following are some examples of operations currently being launched by state and local police agencies:

Operation Seeing RedFort Smith, AR

operation seeing redFor the second time this year, police in Fort Smith, Arkansas have launched Operation Seeing Red.

The 3-week long operation is geared towards monitoring intersections to catch drivers who are speeding through red lights and disobeying traffic laws.

Police say although they plan on watching certain intersections where accidents are more common, drivers should expect to be cited on any street in the city at any time.

Fort Smith Sgt. Daniel Grubbs said that hundreds of tickets were written out to drivers during the first operation in February, resulting in 10s of thousands of dollars in extra revenue for the city.

Grubbs says no warnings will be issued by officers during the enforcement period.

Operation Thunder – Floyd County, GA

Rome police Lt. Chirs DeHart unveiling Operation Thunder, Thursday

Rome police Lt. Chirs DeHart unveiling Operation Thunder, Thursday

Operation Thunder officially kicked off Thursday night in Georgia, were officers with the city of Rome and Floyd County set up a massive roadblock at the Rome bypass and John Maddox Drive.

Officials say the 60-day program is focused on Floyd County in an attempt to help crack down on dangerous drivers and have assured the public it is not just a ploy to generate revenue.

“We want the citizens of Rome and Floyd County to understand this is not about writing citations. This is not about making arrests,” Rome police Lt. Chris DeHart said. “This is about saving lives and making a positive impact in our community.”

Now at least the mafia or your local stick up kid don’t have the nerve to tell you they’re robbing you for your own good, but DeHart did get stark, saying that like Operation Seeing Red, officers will practice “zero tolerance” during the two month period – meaning no warnings will be issued.

A Georgia state Thunder Task Force will assist in the operation and set up large-scale traffic checkpoints throughout the county, with the support of Rome and Floyd County police, the sheriff’s office and the local Georgia State Patrol post, officials say.

Concentrated speed patrols will also be staged along highly-traveled state routes.

“If you are caught drinking and driving, or not wearing your seat belt, speeding on our roadways or driving while distracted, you will be ticketed,” DeHart said.

Operation Border to Border – Eastern U.S.

operation border to borderState police in the eastern United States seeking to capitalize on one of the most popular summer vacation dates of the year, will again, this weekend, re-engage in Operation Border to Border.

The coordinated traffic safety enforcement initiative, comprised of eight state police and highway patrol agencies, will target approximately 791 miles of U.S. Route 15 – which originates in Waterboro, South Carolina, and ends in Corning, New York, and 124 miles of U.S. Route 17 in the State of Georgia that parallels I-95.

For three days, troopers from North Carolina, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Virginia will work together, conducting saturation patrols, sobriety check points and other enforcement initiatives along the major, non-interstate highways.

This is the fourth year for the coordinated, multi-state enforcement effort targeting U.S. Route 15 and second year to include U.S. Route 17 in Georgia.

During the 3-day effort, troopers will cover approximately 158 miles of roadway in North Carolina and will be paying special attention to those motorists who are driving careless and reckless, exceeding the posted speed limit and following too closely, officials say.

The initiative begins at 12:01 a.m. Friday, June 12, 2015, and runs through midnight, Sunday, June 14, 2015.

Operation Safe-Summer – Fayetteville, NC

operation safe summerPolice in Fayetteville, North Carolina will even be going after people looking to have a good time in Operation Safe-Summer.

In an effort to reduce what officials are calling “house party related violence” in the community, twelve officers will be tasked with monitoring summer parties and events throughout the city’s three police districts.

Police have asked residents to tell them about planned parties before hand so officers can be nearby in case they get too loud or out of control.

“We don’t want to beak the party up,” Fayetteville Police Chief Harold Medlock said. “We want to keep somebody, some young person from dying. That’s what it’s all about.”

Fayetteville Mayor Nat Robinson is also urging the local government to strengthen the effort by passing an ordinance that would fine any homeowner $500 if police have to be called more than once to their residence.

As early 20th century journalist and classical liberal thinker H.L. Mencken said, “the urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule [it.]”

While the guise of “public safety” sways most to accept crimes, that if perpetrated by private individuals, would never be tolerated – the public veneer of “serving and protecting” is slowly starting to fade away to be seen for what it really is: pillaging and plundering.

banner-jury

Click Here For Information On Your Rights as a Juror

Police Departments Around Country Launch Summer Ticketing Blitzkriegs is a post from Cop Block - Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights